even though it'll fall into to sub-5FPS range. If you guys want more 8GB cards tested, like Vega 56/64 and the RTX SUPER range, let me know in the comments and I'll do a follow-up article to see what performance is like. bad.īut, 8GB of framebuffer is never going to be enough for true 8K gaming and I only ran that card as a quick test. The new Navi-based Radeon RX 5700 XT at 8K? Don't even talk about it - 1.7FPS is just. Turing cards are a 1-2 FPS slower at 8K with the Bad Ass preset, but things change in favor of Turing on the Medium preset.ĪMD's previous flagship Radeon VII graphics card and its 16GB of HBM2 come into play here, with 9FPS average - beating out the RTX 2080 Ti and its 8FPS average, and equaling the TITAN RTX that costs 3x more. This was a strange anomoly, so I re-benched all of the NVIDIA graphics cards again and had the exact same results in the end. We've stayed with GIGABYTE for our motherboard with their awesome Z370 AORUS Gaming 7.īorderlands 3 can't even muster 10FPS on the TITAN RTX at 8K on the Bad Ass preset, strangely enough both of the Pascal-based cards from NVIDIA in the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and TITAN Xp are 1FPS ahead of the TITAN RTX and 2FPS ahead of the other Turing-based card in the RTX 2080 Ti. The CPU is cooled by the Corsair H115i PRO cooler, with the 8700K overclocked to 5GHz. Welcome to the latest revision of our GPU test bed, with our system being upgraded from the Intel Core i7-7700K to the Core i7-8700K.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |